Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Feb 23, 2010

Google's New Aardvark - Move aside Facebook

Afterlaunching Buzz last week, Google have continued on the social track by now acquiring social search service Aardvark.


The deal, rumoured to be worth around $50 million, could see Google use the social search engine as an answer to, well, Yahoo! Answers. Through IM, Twitter and e-mail, Aardvark lets you ask full-text questions and then takes your social connections and attempts to identify the best person within your network (or extended network - friends and family) who might be able to assist in giving that answer.


Here is how Wired explains the concept behind Aardvark:



Users who sign up give (Aard)Vark access to one of their social networks - Facebook, LinkedIn or the e-mails in their contact list. Users then say what things they are confident answering questions about (e.g. chess, cooking, country music). Vark then routes future questions - such as what's the best country band out of the south from the 1970s or where's a good sushi restaurant near Santa Monica - to the right person. A series of algorithms keeps tuning the targeting by watching if a user's answers are quick and useful, deciding whether their friends are also experts, and checking if a user is online or has been asked to answer too many questions recently.



The news was confirmed by Aardvark CEO (and ex-Googler) Max Ventilla who emailed TechCrunch with the following: "We can confirm that Google has signed a deal to acquire us but have no further comment."


So I'm afraid that's all the news we have so far folks, but if we hear anything more, we will be sure to let you know.




Technorati : , , ,

Del.icio.us : , , ,

Zooomr : , , ,

Flickr : , , ,

Oct 26, 2009

7 Biggest Google Mistakes Made by Small Business Owners

7 Biggest Google Adwords Mistakes


Once we get to take a look at the settings in these campaigns it is usually pretty obvious why the company is not achieving the results it expected:



  1. The website is not designed to be compelling, nor capture leads or sales.

  2. The keywords are too broad in nature - e.g. 'carpet' and 'cleaning', instead of 'carpet cleaning Houston'

  3. The keywords are lumped into single adgroups with no attempt at putting them into themed groups: e.g. 'carpet cleaning', 'tile cleaning', 'upholstery cleaning' are all in a single adgroup.

  4. Conversions are not set up, so there is no method to track leads and what keyword, ad etc. generated the lead.

  5. Ads do not match the keywords, or do not point to the relevant page in the website.

  6. Ads are poorly constructed and do not entice visitors.

  7. Bid costs are too low relative to daily budgets or vice versa.


It is perfectly possible to stick a bunch of seemingly relevant keywords into a campaign, slap together an ad and let it rip!!!


However, doing this will almost certainly not bring you the results you would like.


Does Google Want You to Fail?


Of course the answer is no, but you have to understand that Google has built its dominant market share by realizing that people using a search engine want 'relevance' - they want to find what they are looking for quickly and easily. This means that if an advertiser is bidding on the keyword "dogs", but they sell "custom dog collars", they will get a ton of searches for anything containing the word "dog", 99.9% of which will not be relevant for "custom dog collars", so the click through rate (CTR) will be very low for this advertiser. (CTR is the percentage of clicks relative to the number of times that an ad was shown in a search).


Google will penalize this advertiser by showing their ads lower down the page (or more likely on page 24!!!) because they are not relevant to most people searching for dog related keywords. This gives a better experience to the search engine user, which is the goal.


How to construct a well put-together Adwords campaign is not rocket-science, but it does take a degree of understanding of the mechanics of the system to ensure the type of results that are desired.


http://www.robertjrussell.com




Technorati : , , , ,

Del.icio.us : , , , ,

Zooomr : , , , ,

Flickr : , , , ,